• PMI-logoMember ID: 1669343
  • PMP #1340784
  • Member Since: 7 May 2010
  • Expires: 16 June 2019
  • Leadership

    • Managers manage projects and Leaders lead
      people

  • Lead by Example – This is probably the best
    advice I can give; unfortunately, it has become a rare quality in corporate
    America.  In my opinion “leading by example” encompasses motivating,
    coaching, mentoring, inspiring, promoting teamwork, and being a visionary.
    I have given entire lectures on “Leadership” but that is not the intention of
    this web page.

  • Scope
    • This web page excludes leadership and program
      management in the real world.  The scope of this web page is limited to notes I put
      together for myself prior to taking the PMP test.  This is not an all
      encompassing list e.g. it does not have much on ITTOs.  This is
      just a list of major topics to review prior to taking the test.
      Feel free to use at your own risk.

  • My Views on Program Management and PMI
  • How many times have you heard that engineers make bad managers.
    Well, it is my opinion that engineers have the potential to make the
    best managers since they have a technical background and can relate
    with the technical issues instead of blindly interpreting metrics.
    Technical people can easily be frustrated trying to get a non-technical
    manager to understand.
  • Unfortunately, I am less than impressed with
    the PMI process.  PMI is now a “big business.”  If you blindly
    follow the PMP process then you will surely fail as a PM.



PMI-logo




PMBOK Bookmarks

Ch 1 Essentials

Ch 2 Prj Mgmt

Ch 3 PMBOK Foundations

Ch 4
Integration

Ch 5 Scope

Ch
6 Time

Ch
7 Cost


Ch 8 Quality


Ch 9 HR

Ch 10
Comms


Ch 11 Risk

Ch 12
Procurement

Glossary of PMBOK
Terms

  •  

  •  

  •  

  •  

  • My Views on Studying for and passing the PMP Test

    • Study Recommendations:

      • I recommend purchasing Alex Sherrer’s
        PM Road Trip book.
        I found his book and associated web site outstanding.  The book
        is fairly price and I found it easy to use his web site search
        engine to look up areas I had questions on.

      • Sign up for PMI and download a softcopy of
        the PMBOK.  As it turns out you save a little money when you
        take the test.

      • Try to form a study group; unfortunately,
        this wasn’t an option for me because I couldn’t find anyone
        interested in taking the test.

      • Take as many tests as you can but only
        from sources that explain their answers.  Be careful on the web
        since some questions are outdated and based on the 3rd ed. PMBOK.

      • While studying, I suggest looking up the
        answers on practice tests as soon as you finish each question.
        This way your logic is fresh in your mind and you can immediately
        analyze what was wrong with your logic when you finish the question.
        This way you won’t remember the logic used to derive a wrong answer.
        When you think you are ready to take the real PMP certification
        test, then take practice tests all the way through to see where your
        overall knowledge stands.  I am not good at memorization and
        that is why I chose the engineering field where you can figure
        problems out based on analysis. The method above works for me but
        may not work for everybody, use the method that works best for you.

      • Don’t forget that a PM must be “PROACTIVE”.

    • Things
      I DON’T Recommend:

      1. I DON’T think you need to purchase Rita Mulcahy’s Book.  While
        many people recommend it I found it overpriced and convoluted.
        Even the CD that comes with it only has a sampling of questions
        and costs extra.
        With that being said, I did find her questions that were in the
        book good and they had good explanations.  Unfortunately,
        Rita Mulcahy passed away on May 15th 2010 from complications related to
        a five-year battle with Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC).

      2. I DON’T recommend purchasing PMI’s


        PMBOK® Guide—Fourth Edition
        .
        Why you ask, for one you can download a free soft copy of the book
        when you sign up for PMI, which you have to do to take the test
        anyway.  Second, it is easier to search the soft copy for
        information and you can print specific pages to study from. Third,
        the book really isn’t that good and there is a lot of testable
        information not in the PMBOK.

      3. I DON’T recommend attending ESI International.
        Their test questions don’t have their answers explained.
        For this reason, there are a lot of questions you just have to
        say, “hah”. The
        class is very expensive, their instructor wasn’t current, and the
        instructor failed to answer follow up questions after the course was
        over.  If you need PDUs then I suggest looking for some of the
        free ones or try another provider.

  • Books

  • Downloads

  • Earning PDUs

  • Formulas

    • PMP

      • Point of Total
        Assumption (PTA)

        • = Target Cost +
          (Ceiling Price –  Target Price)/Buyer’s Percentage Share of Cost

      • Standard Deviation

        • =
          (Pessimistic Estimate – Optimistic Estimate) / 6

      • Return on Investment (ROI)

        • = (Benefit – Cost)/Cost

    • EVMS

      • AC – Actual Cost of the project up to the
        measurement point

      • BAC – Total Budgeted Cost of the project

      • SPI = EV / PV

      • CPI = EV / AC

      • SV = EV – PV

      • CV = EV – AC

      • PV = Planned % complete x BAC

      • EV = Actual % complete x BAC

      • EAC = BAC / CPI

      • ETC = EAC – AC

  • Glossary of PMBOK Terms

  • Links

  • PMI PDUs

  • Test Questions

  • Training


  • PMBOK Chapter 1 – Project Essentials


  • PMBOK Chapter 2 – Project Management

    • Constrained Optimization Methods
      – Constrained optimization methods are complex, mathematical models normally
      used on very large projects.  We will need to recognize the following
      terms as being part of constrained optimization methods in the project
      selection process: linear/non-linear programming, integer programming,
      dynamic programming, and multi-objective programming (Sherrer,
      2009).

    • Organizational Structure (Sherrer,
      2009).

      • Functional – is based on departmental,
        specialty, or business lines, such as accounting, marketing, sales,
        customer service, information systems, and so on. This is the most
        common organizational structure, and it’s where each person reports to
        one superior and functional managers are in charge of personnel.

      • Projectized – is centrally based around
        projects, so reporting structures fluctuate based on those projects.  Projectized
        organizations derive their revenue from providing services to others, so
        common projectized organizations include accounting, architectural,
        construction, engineering, and other professional services firms (Sherrer,
        2009).

      • Matrix – a mix between functional and
        projectized organization, and they may range from a weak to a balanced
        to a strong matrix. Matrix organizations are still vertically arranged
        by departments, business units, or expertise. But they have an
        additional alignment by projects, products, or similar classification
        that stretches beyond the vertical alignment. This second alignment can
        either be horizontal (usually seen in a weak matrix structure) or
        vertically (usually seen in a strong matrix structure).

        • Weak – the project manager has very
          little authority, particularly in performance and personnel issues
          involving the project team because team members still report to
          their functional manager first and to the project manager second.
          This situation closely resembles what a project manager faces in a
          functional organization, and he or she is most likely serving as project coordinators.  The project manager faces the same
          obstacles in a weak matrix as in a functional organization, so
          resource availability, prioritization, loyalty, and performance are
          likely obstacles.

        • Strong – the project managers have
          a much greater authority over the project team, and team members
          report first to the project manager and secondly to the functional
          manager. But the functional manager is still responsible for the
          human resource administration of his or her direct reports. The
          project manager may also have full- or part-time support
          staff available. For many project mangers, this could be considered
          the best structure because it enables him or her to have a high
          level of control over the project team but not have to get bogged
          down in personnel administration.

        • Balanced – is somewhere between a
          weak and strong matrix, and there are no definite indicators as to
          what constitutes a balanced matrix because there are many possible
          combinations an organization could make. But the overriding goal of
          a balanced matrix is to provide the project managers with sufficient
          authority to successfully manage projects while leaving the
          functional manager and its structure in place for all of the
          benefits it provides.

      • A composite structure is a temporary
        shift in the organizational structure for a particular project (Sherrer,
        2009).

       

    • The Project Expediter acts primarily as a staff assistant and
      communications coordinator only and cannot enforce any decisions.
      He/she monitors and reports on the status of the project to senior
      management. This role has no authority (Not in PMBOK) (Mulcahy, 2009).

    • The Project Coordinator role is similar to expediter, but has
      some limited, referential authority to make decisions. The project coordinator may report to
      some higher-level manager than the expediter (Not in PMBOK) (Mulcahy, 2009).

    • Net present value (NPV):  NPV converts future monies to present
      values, (as does present value) but it’s more precise because it takes into
      account money being received while the project is underway. It shows future
      cash flows discounted back to present value expressed as a percentage rate
      of return. As with present value, a higher net present value is a better
      choice.  The formula is very complicated and isn’t provided here (Sherrer,
      2009)

    • Internal Rate of Return (IRR): The IRR is the inverse of
      the net present value, and is based on the same formula. While NPV shows the
      cost of capital, IRR shows a break-even rate of return.  IRR is
      not easy to compute or understand. A higher IRR is the preferred
      choice (Sherrer, 2009).

    • Economic Value Added: Economic value added is an extension of net
      present value and can be used to measure the expected wealth a project will
      generate. A higher EVA is preferred. Its formula is (Sherrer, 2009):

      • EVA = (Return on Capital – Cost of Capital) (Capital
        Invested in Project)

    • Return on Investment (ROI): ROI is attractive for its
      simplicity, but it doesn’t reflect the time value of money or profitability.
      A larger ROI is the better choice (Sherrer, 2009):

      • ROI = (Benefit – Cost)/Cost

    • Future Value (FV): We all know that $1 today will not have the
      same purchasing power in the future, so the future value formula accounts
      for this time value of money. It uses the interest rate and the number of
      periods to calculate what the future value of money will be.  A higher
      future value is preferred. Using future value, if the interest rate is 5
      percent, $1 today will be worth $1.05 next year (Sherrer, 2009):

      • FV = Current Value x (1 + I)^n where I is the interest rate
        and n is the number of periods.

    • Present Value (PV): If a project will return $1 next year, what
      is that dollar worth in today’s value? The present value formula is the
      inverse of the future value formula, and it converts future money to reflect
      what its present value is by using the interest rate (Sherrer, 2009):

      • PV = Future Value / (1 + I)^n where I is the interest rate
        and n is the number of periods

  • PMBOK Chapter 3 – PMBOK
    Foundations


  • PMBOK
    Chapter 4 – Project Integration Management

    • Project Management Plan (Sherrer, 2009):

      • Change management plan –  This
        plan describes the integrated change control process.

      • Configuration management plan – This
        describes how configuration management will be performed on the project.
        The configuration management system defines configurable items, such as
        product specifications, and the change control procedures on those items
        (sections 4.5, 5.1).

      • Requirements management plan

        Describes how the requirements will be elicited, analyzed, documented,
        prioritized, and managed throughout the project. Requirements drive the
        features and characteristics of the project’s deliverables. This  plan
        is created in the Collect Requirements process (section 5.1).

      • Scope management plan – Describes the
        processes for creating the scope and how the scope will be managed and
        controlled. This plan is an output of the Define Scope process (section
        5.2).

      • Schedule management plan – Describes
        the processes for creating the schedule and how the schedule will be
        managed and controlled. The schedule management plan is not a named
        output of any specific process, but it should be established as part of
        the Develop Project Management Plan process (section 4.2).

      • Cost management plan – Describes how
        project costs will be estimated and the project budget created and
        structured. It also defines how the budget will be managed, controlled,
        monitored, and reported on. The cost management plan is not a named
        output any specific process, but it should be established as part of
        the Develop Project Management Plan process (section 4.2).

      • Quality management plan – Describes how
        the project will conform to the organization’s quality policy. It
        describes the quality assurance, quality control, and continuous process
        improvement for the project. This  plan is an output of the Plan Quality
        process (section 8.1).

      • Process Improvement Plan – Describes
        what processes will be used to analyze project performance with the aim
        of eliminating non-value added activities from the project. It is
        an output of the Plan Quality process (section 8.1).

      • Human resource plan – Describes how
        project team members will be acquired and released from the project,
        what training will be required, reward and recognition plans, and any
        regulatory personnel requirements. This plan is an output of the Develop
        Human Resource Plan process (section 9.1).

      • Communications management plan
        Describes the processes, mediums, methods, regularity, and
        responsibilities for project communication, particularly with
        stakeholders and within the project team. The communication management
        plan is an output of the Plan Communications process (section 10.2).

      • Risk management plan – Establishes the
        processes, responsibilities, responses, budget,  structure, and
        categorization for project risks. This plan is an output of the Plan
        Risk Management process (section 11.1).

      • Procurement management plan – Describes
        the procurement processes for the project, including responsibilities,
        contract types allowed, metrics, standardized procurement documents, and
        insurance requirements. This plan is an output of the Plan Procurements
        process (section 12.1).

  • PMBOK Chapter 5 – Project Scope Management

    • The Delphi method is a systematic, interactive forecasting method
      which relies on a panel of experts. The experts answer questionnaires in two
      or more rounds. After each round, a facilitator provides an anonymous
      summary of the experts’ forecasts.

    • An affinity diagram
      helps people address complex issues through brainstorming and data
      categorization. Affinity diagrams can be used to generate ideas, identify
      issues, and find relationships between factors contributing to an issue.
      Once categories are established, the affinity diagram can be used to
      prioritize items and develop an action plan.

    • A RACI chart lists all activities and
      the project role(s) involved with the activity, and what level of
      responsibility the role has for the activity.

      • Responsible:
        The role(s) performing the work.

      • Accountable:
        The owner of the activity.

      • Consultant:
        If applicable, the role(s) serving as
        subject matter experts or as decision-makers.

      • Inform:
        If applicable, the role(s) who need to be kept informed about the
        activity but not actively engaged.

    • When only a finite amount of requirements can
      be addressed, prioritization can often bring out the worst qualities in
      people since everyone will have a different view of which requirements
      are mandatory, which are essential, and which are merely desirable. The
      group may need different decision making techniques for different
      categories of requirements, but in some manner the requirements will be
      decided by:

      • Unanimity:
        Every single group member agrees on the same option

      • Majority:
        The option with more than  50% of support from group is chosen

      • Plurality:
        The option with the largest block of support is chosen (even if the
        largest block doesn’t have a majority)

      • Dictatorship:
        One person chooses the option.

    • Rolling Wave Planning (RWP) – It’s
      acceptable for portions of the project’s deliverables to be remain
      somewhat undefined. For example, components that are required later in
      the project may not be fully defined up front, but rather the full
      requirements for them will be developed in subsequent planning sessions.

    • Group creativity techniques:
      These techniques encourage lateral thinking for creative problem-solving
      or identifying innovative solutions. They include brainstorming, idea
      and mind mapping, affinity diagrams, and nominal group technique.

  • PMBOK Chapter 6 – Project Time Management

    • These results allow managers to prioritize
      activities for the effective management of project completion, and to
      shorten the planned critical path of a project by pruning critical path
      activities, by “fast tracking” (i.e., performing more activities in
      parallel), and/or by “crashing the critical path” (i.e., shortening
      the durations of critical path activities by adding resources

    • PMP Exam Tip: There are two
      visualization techniques,

      Precedence Diagram Method
      (PDM)
      and Arrow Diagramming Method (ADM). ADM does not
      support FF relationships (Mulcahy, 2009).  Of the two, PDM is used most
      often.

    • Types of Dependencies
      (Sharma, 2010):

      • Finish-Start: In this dependency, an activity cannot
        start before a previous activity has ended. For example, you cannot cook a
        stew before gathering all the ingredients. Therefore, the activity “Gather
        Ingredients” needs to finish, before the activity “Cook Stew” can begin.
        This is the most commonly used dependency.

      • Start-Start: In this dependency, there is a defined
        relationship between the start of activities.

      • Finish-Finish: In this dependency, there is a defined
        relationship between the end dates of activities.

      • Start-Finish: In this dependency, there is a defined
        relationship between the start of one activity and the end date of a
        successor activity. This dependency is rarely used.

    • Resource intensity
      shows when and how many resources are needed at a particular time within
      the project.

    • Resource leveling
      techniques match the resource needs of the project with the
      organization’s ability to provide resources. When specific resource
      types are scarce, there are only a few options if the project budget
      doesn’t allow for procuring them from outside the project. One is that
      the higher priority activities can have the scarce resources allocated
      to them first and the dates of the other activities staggered so that
      the resource intensity is lowered.

    • Resource smoothing
      is a form of resource leveling, and it tries to maintain the most
      efficient use of the pool of resources types across the project by
      smoothing out the peaks and valleys of the resource intensity.

    • The
      critical chain is the
      longest sequence of dependent (and not necessarily sequential)
      activities that prevent the project’s duration from being any shorter.
      The
      Critical Chain Method
      (CCM) recognizes that crucial events may not be sequential nor may they
      be even within the same project. The primary difference between the
      critical chain method
      and the
      critical path method
      is its approach to the schedule. The critical chain
      method
      can be thought of as
      encouraging a relay race within the project team against the schedule
      while the critical path method
      focuses on maintaining and meeting the schedule.  Creating
      critical chain buffers
      is also a way to mitigate risks relating to resource scarcity
      (Sherrer, 2009).

    • Parkinson’s Law
      states that work expands to  fill the time available. This means that if
      it we estimated an activity will take two weeks, it’ll end up taking two
      weeks even if it could have been finished it in one1
      (Sherrer, 2009).

    • Activity dependencies

      • Mandatory:
        A required, hard logic,
        or inherent order to the activities. For example, a book can’t be bound
        until it has been printed.  Mandatory dependencies can also be caused by
        regulatory requirements or organizational procedures. Mandatory
        dependencies cannot be altered, they are what they are and
        the project has to adhere to those dependencies.

      • Discretionary:
        Known as
        soft logic
        or
        preferential logic.
        A logical or preferred order to the activities. For example, in a
        remodeling project the team would prefer that carpeting not be installed
        until all painting has been completed. Discretionary dependencies can be
        reordered if necessary but doing so may result in additional risk
        factors.

      • External:
        The dependency is outside of the project, and usually beyond of its
        direct control. For example, a technician can’t begin installing the
        equipment until the vendor delivers it. Though sometimes external
        dependencies can be influenced or made contractual (such as with a
        vendor or consultant), they can’t usually be altered. External
        dependencies can also lead to scheduling problems when no hard date is
        available. For example, some modes of transportation can provide only a
        date range of when materials can be expected to arrive.

    • The Triangular Distribution is
      typically used as a subjective
      description of a population
      for which there is only limited sample data.  It is
      based on a
      knowledge of the minimum and maximum and an inspired guess as to what
      the modal value might be.  Despite being a simplistic description of a
      population, it is a very useful distribution for modeling processes
      where the relationship between variables is known, but data is scarce
      (possibly because of the high cost of collection).
      It is also used as an alternative to the Beta distribution in PERT, CPM
      and similar forms of project management tool
      (Wikipedia, 2010).

  • PMBOK
    Chapter 7 – Project Cost Management

    • Estimating methods

      • Analogous estimating uses the costs from similar projects or activities
        as the basis for the current project. As long as the two activities are
        similar and are occurring under similar situations this can be a fairly
        reliable technique (Sherrer, 2009).

      • Parametric estimating
        uses mathematical formulas to derive estimates from. It isn’t applicable to
        all activities, but when it is it usually produces the most accurate
        estimates. For example, if it’s known that a material will cost $10 per
        cubic meter and 100 cubic meters are needed, the estimated cost is $1,000 (Sherrer,
        2009).

      • Bottom-up estimating
        decomposes activities to the lowest level possible for cost estimating
        purposes, and then aggregates component costs back up to a summary activity
        level. Bottom-up estimating can take some time to do well, and it
        requires specific details to be known about the activity, so it isn’t
        generally an available option early in the project planning processes (Sherrer,
        2009).

      • Top-down estimating is the counterpart to bottom-up,
        and it estimates costs by looking only at broad, summary-level
        activities. Top-down estimates are the least accurate (Sherrer, 2009).

      • Three-point estimates,
        sometimes called PERT analysis, help to remove the uncertainty from
        estimates by providing a weighted average using the pessimistic, optimistic,
        and most-likely values. We saw this formula in chapter six when we were
        estimating activity durations: Optimistic
        -$75; Most Likely – $100; Pessimistic -$150 (Sherrer, 2009):

        • ((Optimistic Cost Estimate + (4
          x Most-Likely Cost Estimate ) + Pessimistic Cost Estimate)) /6

        • Three-point estimate =
          ($75 + (4 x $100) + $150) / 6

        • Three-point estimate =
          $625 / 6

        • Three-point estimate =
          $104.17

      • If the project involves procurement activities,
        vendor bid analysis may also be used to develop estimates.

    • The experienced learning rates for
      exploratory discovery and development processes, for individuals and
      organizations, is more the focus of the main Learning curve article.
      The rule used for representing the learning curve effect states
      that the more times a task has been performed, the less time will be
      required on each subsequent iteration. Learning curve theory states that
      as the quantity of items produced doubles, costs decrease at a
      predictable rate (Wikipedia, 2010).

    • Types of Cost

      • Direct costs can be attributed
        specifically to a detailed or summary activity of the project. For
        example, dedicated labor, material, supplies, equipment, licenses,
        fees, training, travel, or professional service fees. The defining
        characteristic for a direct cost is that the goods or
        services are used exclusively for the project (Sherrer, 2009).

      • Indirect costs are incurred by the
        project, but the goods or services are also used for non-project
        activities. Common indirect costs might be facility or equipment
        rentals and utilities. Indirect costs are typically harder to
        quantify. For example, if a color printer is shared by
        several project teams, it’s difficult to definitively determine what
        percentage of costs each should share (Sherrer, 2009).

      • Variable costs fluctuate and can’t
        be predicted with absolute certainty. For example, travel or
        transportation costs that can change depending upon the cost of fuel
        or certain commodities and types of raw materials (Sherrer, 2009).

      • Fixed costs are static throughout
        the project or have only a small  likelihood of fluctuation.
        Fixed costs are usually for items such as rents, leases, licenses,
        salaries, and fixed fees (Sherrer, 2009).

    • Working capital, also known as “WC”, is
      a financial metric which represents operating liquidity available to a
      business. Along with fixed assets such as plant and equipment, working
      capital is considered a part of operating capital. It is calculated as
      current assets minus current liabilities (Wikipedia, 2010).

    • Economic Value Added or EVA is
      an estimate of economic profit, which can be determined, among other
      ways, by making corrective adjustments to GAAP accounting, including
      deducting the opportunity cost of equity capital. The concept of EVA is
      in a sense nothing more than the traditional, commonsense idea of
      “profit,” however, the utility of having a separate and more precisely
      defined term such as EVA or Residual Cash Flow is that it makes a clear
      separation from dubious accounting adjustments that have enabled
      businesses such as Enron to report profits while in fact being in the
      final approach to becoming insolvent. EVA can be measured as Net
      Operating Profit After Taxes (or NOPAT) less the money cost of capital
      (Wikipedia, 2010).

    • Non-PMBOK Acroymns (ESI,
      2009)

      • Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP)
        =
        Earned Value (EV)

      • Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS)
        =
        Planned Value (PV)

      • Actual cost of Work Performed (ACWP)
        =
        Actual Cost (AC)

      • CPI or SPI greater than ONE is ahead of
        schedule or under budget

    • General classifications for estimate
      accuracy
      (Sherrer, 2009):

      • Rough order of magnitude: -25% to
        +75% accuracy

      • Budget estimate: – 10% to +25%
        accuracy

      • Definitive estimate: – 5% to +10%
        accuracy

    • Funding limit reconciliation matches
      the project’s planned need for funding with the organization’s ability
      to provide that funding. It can be thought of as “resource leveling
      for finances because it reschedules activities to make sure that the
      budget for the scheduled activities doesn’t exceed the available budget
      for that period. For instance, if the estimated cost for scheduled
      activities in the second month of a project is estimated to be $50,000,
      but the organization can only provide funding for $40,000 then there is
      $10,000 of work that has to be rescheduled to another month (Sherrer,
      2009).

  • PMBOK Chapter 8 – Project Quality Management

    • Pareto analysis is a statistical
      technique in decision making that is used for selection of a limited
      number of tasks that produce significant overall effect. It uses the
      Pareto principle – the idea that by doing 20% of work you can generate
      80% of the advantage of doing the entire job. Or in terms of quality
      improvement, a large majority of problems (80%) are produced by a few
      key causes (20%) (Wikipedia, 2010).

    • Ishikawa diagrams (also called
      fishbone diagrams or
      cause-and-effect diagrams) are diagrams that show the causes of a
      certain event. Common uses of the Ishikawa diagram are product design and
      quality defect prevention, to identify potential factors causing an overall
      effect (Wikipedia, 2010).  When the diagram is
      completed, the group can use it to validate assumptions, prioritize
      actions to eliminate contributing factors, and develop an action
      plan
      (Sherrer, 2009).  An Ishikawa or Fishbone
      diagram
      helps stimulate thinking and generate discussion (ESI, 2009).

    • Quality Planning Process Tools
      (Sherrer,
      2009):

      • Cost-Benefit analysis

      • Benchmarking

      • Design of Experiments

      • Cost of quality

      • Additional quality planning tools


    • Six Sigma
      (Wikipedia, 2010).

      • 1 Sigma = 68.25%

      • 2 Sigma = 95.46%

      • 3 Sigma = 99.73%

      • 6 Sigma = 99.99% (3 defects per
        million items – ESI, 2009)

    • Quality Control Techniques

      • Flowcharts and Diagrams

      • Cause and Effect Diagrams

      • Pareto Charts

      • Control Charts

      • Run Charts

      • Checklists

      • Kaizen

      • Benchmarking

    • Design of experiments (DOE) is a
      statistical method that can help make processes and products more
      efficient by mathematically simulating changes all at once to the
      variables affecting the process. The results can then be viewed to see
      how the changed factors not only influence the end result but how the
      factors relate to each other.

    • PDCA (plan-do-check-act) is an
      iterative four-step problem-solving process typically used in business
      process improvement. It is also known as the Deming cycle, Shewhart cycle,
      Deming wheel, or plan-do-study-act.

      • PLAN – Establish the objectives and
        processes necessary to deliver results in accordance with the
        expected output. By making the expected output the focus, it differs
        from other techniques in that the completeness and accuracy of the
        specification is also part of the improvement.

      • DO – Implement the new processes.
        Often on a small scale if possible.

      • CHECK – Measure the new processes
        and compare the results against the expected results to ascertain
        any differences.

      • ACT – Analyze the differences to
        determine their cause. Each will be part of either one or more of
        the P-D-C-A steps. Determine where to apply changes that will
        include improvement. When a pass through these four steps does not
        result in the need to improve, refine the scope to which PDCA is
        applied until there is a plan that involves improvement.

    • When the outcomes of processes have no
      relationship between each other, they are considered statistically
      independent
      . The errors in an order entry process won’t have any
      correlation to the mechanical breakdowns of a truck in the
      transportation system (Sherrer, 2009).

    • When one choice excludes another, the choices are
      said to be mutually exclusive. Choosing to replace a metal-based
      product component with a plastic-based component negates any options
      that involve using an aluminum-based component (Sherrer, 2009).

    • Capability Maturity Model Integration
      (CMMI)
      provides a
      framework that focuses on improving business processes by
      establishing best practices and then appraising those organizations
      on a maturity level from one to five. A higher maturity level
      indicates that an organization’s practices are more likely to be
      efficient and quality-focused (Sherrer, 2009).

      • 1. Initial: The procedures for managing the process are
        reactive in nature rather than proactive.

      • 2. Managed: The process is managed through isolated
        projects or similar efforts.

      • 3. Defined: The process is tailored towards
        organizational needs rather than just being focused on isolated
        projectized objectives.

      • 4. Quantitatively Managed: The process is aggressively
        measured and controlled.

      • 5. Optimizing: There are concerted and ongoing efforts
        focused on improving the process.

    • The term Kaizen (Japanese for “improvement”) is a Japanese
      word adopted into English referring to a philosophy or practices focusing on
      continuous improvement in manufacturing activities, business activities in
      general, and even life in general, depending on interpretation and usage.
      When used in the business sense and applied to the workplace, kaizen
      typically refers to activities that continually improve all functions of a
      business, from manufacturing to management and from the CEO to the assembly
      line workers. By improving standardized activities and processes, kaizen
      aims to eliminate waste (see lean manufacturing). Not in the 4th Ed. PMBOK
      (Wikipedia, 2010).

    • Kanban (means “card” or “board”) is a concept related to lean and
      just-in-time (JIT) production. The Japanese word
      kanban
      is a common
      term meaning “signboard” or “billboard”.  Not in
      the 4th Ed. PMBOK (Wikipedia, 2010).

    • Marginal Analysis – Another purpose of
      cost-benefit analysis is related to continual
      improvement
      . As we strive for improving products and processes,
      we don’t want to exceed a point beyond which the costs of the
      improvements aren’t offset by the anticipated increase in revenue
      (sales or profits) (Sherrer, 2009). In other words, incremental
      revenue equals the incremental cost (ESI, 2009).

    • Gold-plating
      the quality requirements
      – Exceeding the customer’s quality
      requirements results in quality costs incurred by the project that
      provide no real benefit to the customer (Sherrer, 2009).

  • PMBOK Chapter 9 – Human Resource Management

    • A Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM), (also known as
      RACI matrix or Linear Responsibility Chart (LRC)), describes the
      participation by various roles in completing tasks or deliverables for a
      project or business process. It is especially useful in clarifying roles and
      responsibilities in cross-functional/departmental projects and processes.

    • A RACI chart lists all activities and the project role(s) involved
      with the activity, and what level of responsibility the role has for the
      activity. Even if activities have not been fully defined, a RACI chart can
      be done for work packages (Sherrer, 2009):

      • Responsible: The role(s) performing the work.

      • Accountable: The owner of the activity.

      • Consultant: If applicable, the role(s) serving as subject
        matter experts or as decision-makers.

      • Inform: If applicable, the role(s) who need to be kept
        informed about the activity but not actively engaged.

    • Contingency theories propose that there
      is not a single, best leadership style that is effective in all
      situations, and managers must change their style to best fit the
      circumstance.

    • The Expectancy Theory was proposed by
      Victor Vroom of the Yale School of Management, and he suggested that
      employees are really motivated by goals only when three beliefs are
      present (Sherrer, 2009):

      • Valence: The person wants to achieve the
        goal.

      • Expectancy: The person believes it’s
        possible to attain the goal.

      • Instrumentality: Instrumentality is a
        judgment the person makes about whether he or she believes that the
        reward will be given.

    • Interpersonal Power

      • Legitimate: Also known as formal
        or normative power
        , this type of power comes from one’s position, title,
        or hierarchy.

      • Expert: This type of power comes from
        one’s knowledge, expertise, skills, talents, or experience.

      • Reward: This type of power comes from
        one’s ability to bestow desired rewards to others.

      • Coercive: This type of power comes from
        one’s ability to apply negative influences, such as punishments, on
        others.

      • Referent: This type of power comes from
        one’s charisma, personality, or hero/heroine status.

    • Co-location is providing a common physical area for all or
      most of the team members.  Co-location helps improve communication and
      facilitates team-building (Sherrer, 2009).  When you do this, you
      can increase communication and help them build a sense of community.
      Sometimes the room the co-located team meets in is called a war room
      (O’Reilly, 2007).

    • Once responsibilities have been assigned for
      deliverables, an organizational breakdown structure (OBS) can
      provide an alternative method for business units to view the project
      activities, work packages, or deliverables assigned to their
      departments. The OBS is really just a high-level work breakdown
      structure organized by department or business unit.

    • Douglas McGregor Theory X
      and Theory Y
      (not in 4th Ed. PMBOK)

      • Theory X

        • dislike work and will avoid it if they can;

        • have to be controlled and threatened before they
          will work hard;

        • don’t want responsibility and prefer to be
          directed;

        • want to feel secure at work.

      • Theory Y

        • actually want to work;

        • can be self-directing in line with the firm’s
          aims, if they are committed;

        • will be committed if motivated by rewards
          addressing their higher needs;

        • can accept responsibility and may even actively
          seek it;

        • are imaginative and creative and can use their
          ingenuity to solve problems at work.

    • William G. Ouchi Theory Z – Theory Z focused on increasing employee loyalty to the company by providing
      a job for life with a strong focus on the well-being of the employee, both
      on and off the job. According to Ouchi, Theory Z management tends to
      promote stable employment, high productivity, and high employee morale and
      satisfaction (Wikipedia, 2010). Theory Z managers believe that
      employees are motivated when they have a long-term stake in the
      organization, such as involvement in the decision-making process (Sherrer,
      2009).

    • Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (not in 4th Ed. PMBOK)

       

    • The Halo Effect refers to a cognitive bias whereby the perception
      of a particular trait is influenced by the perception of the former
      traits in a sequence of interpretations.  Edward L. Thorndike was
      the first to support the halo effect with empirical research. In a
      psychology study published in 1920, Thorndike asked commanding officers
      to rate their soldiers; Thorndike found high cross-correlation between
      all positive and all negative traits. People seem not to think of other
      individuals in mixed terms; instead we seem to see each person as
      roughly good or roughly bad across all categories of measurement (not in 4th Ed. PMBOK) (Wikipedia, 2010).
      Just because a person is good in a technical field does not mean he/she will
      also be a good project manager (Mulcahy, 2009).

    • Conflict Resolution (Sherrer, 2009):

      • Problem solving, also known as confronting, is the
        preferred approach because it’s the one most likely to result in a
        win-win solution for all parties. Problem solving is a
        logical approach to finding the cause as well as the best solution.
        It lets everyone discuss contributing factors and what the pros and
        cons are for each solution. Problem solving is best used when there
        is sufficient time to approach the problem and the group members
        have a certain level of trust with each other. Problem solving is
        also good at fostering  team development because it involves
        everyone in exploring the issue.

      • Compromise is when all parties perform some give-and-take
        to reach a middle settlement. Unfortunately, this results in a lose-lose solution because no one is truly happy with the
        solution. Problem solving is the best approach, but compromise may be necessary when time is scarce or there’s a
        deadlock that can’t be logically resolved. Compromise can be
        especially difficult when there are strong internal values involved.

      • Forcing is using one’s power to dictate his or her will
        on the group. Forcing results in a win-lose situation,
        and this is generally the worst approach. It’s harmful to team
        morale because the team is always on the losing position. However,
        forcing may be necessary in critical situations when the stakes are
        extremely high and there is no time for identifying alternatives.
        When forcing is needed, its ill effects on the team can be tempered
        by sharing the rationale with them.

      • Smoothing is downplaying the issue or focusing only on
        the positive. It’s really hiding from the problem, and it doesn’t
        address the problem or even acknowledge that the problem exists. Smoothing is not being optimistically healthy –it’s being
        Pollyanna and is a poor conflict response. However, smoothing can be used to buy time or when one party believes the
        stakes are low and giving a “win” on this issue may be used
        to create an obligation later. Smoothing can often be seen
        when one party gives in by saying something like “Well, it’s not
        important anyway, so you choose.”

      • Withdrawal is avoidance or hiding from the problem, so
        it’s not even a conflict resolution technique. Because it
        never addresses the problem, its effect will be only temporary
        and the problem will resurface later.  Withdrawal may be an
        option as a temporary measure when there’s a need for cooling off or
        there are likely to be other alternatives that will present
        themselves if given enough time.

    • Tuckman’s Group Development Model – The
      Forming – Storming – Norming – Performing is a model of group
      development, first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965, who maintained
      that these phases are all necessary and inevitable in order for the team
      to grow, to face up to challenges, to tackle problems, to find
      solutions, to plan work, and to deliver results. This model has become
      the basis for subsequent models (Wikipedia, 2010).

      • Forming – In the first stages of team building, the
        forming of the team
        takes place. The individual’s behavior is driven by a desire to be
        accepted by the others, and avoid controversy or conflict.

      • Storming – Every group will then
        enter the storming stage in which different ideas compete for
        consideration. The team addresses issues such as what problems they
        are really supposed to solve, how they will function independently
        and together and what leadership model they will accept. Team
        members open up to each other and confront each other’s ideas and
        perspectives.

      • Norming – The team manages to have
        one goal and come to a mutual plan for the team at this stage. Some
        may have to give up their own ideas and agree with others in order
        to make the team work.

      • Performing – It is possible for
        some teams to reach the performing stage. These
        high-performing teams are able to function as a unit as they find
        ways to get the job done smoothly and effectively without
        inappropriate conflict or the need for external supervision. Team
        members have become interdependent. By this time they are motivated
        and knowledgeable. The team members are now competent, autonomous
        and able to handle the decision-making process without supervision.

    • Concurrent Engineering involves multi-functional teams and
      overlapping of project schedules (ESI, 2009).

    • Frederick Herzberg – Two Factor
      Theory “The Dual Structure Theory” (Not in PMBOK)

      • Motivator Factors Hygiene Factors

        • Achievement

        • Recognition

        • Work Itself

        • Responsibility

        • Promotion

        • Growth

      • Hygiene Factors

        • Pay and Benefits

        • Company Policy and Administration

        • Relationships with co-workers

        • Supervision

        • Status

        • Job Security

        • Working Conditions

        • Personal life

  • PMBOK Chapter 10 – Project Communications Management

    • # of Communication Channel = N (N – 1) / 2

      • 4 people 4 * 3 = 12/2 = 6

      • 5 people 5 * 4 = 20/2 = 10

      • 12 people 12 * 11 = 132/2 = 66

      • 13 people 13 * 12 = 156/2 = 78

    • In spoken communication, paralingual
      and nonverbal elements carry more information than the words
      chosen. Paralingual elements are the pitch, volume,  and tone of
      voice, and nonverbal communication is body language.  The medium
      plays the biggest part in the formality of a message. E-mails,
      memos, project status reports, and general correspondence is usually
      informal written while public documents, like contracts, are formal
      written. Telephone calls, meetings, and video conferences are usually
      informal verbal, while speeches in front of a large group of people are
      usually formal verbal.

    • In speech, tone is primarily expressed
      through paralingual communication –the vocal elements,
      such as pitch and volume. Nonverbal communication includes
      factors such as body language, facial expressions, posture, and hand
      gestures.   In face-to-face communication, words make up
      only 7% of the message while paralingual elements convey 38%
      and nonverbal elements convey 55%.

    • Salience refers to the
      level of power, legitimacy, and urgency stakeholders have in the
      project. The salience model, introduced by Mitchell, Agle, and Wood, is
      a Venn diagram that helps the project manager understand the priority
      and level of attention a particular stakeholder will need.

      • Power: This is a subjective
        determination of how much influence the stakeholder has to impose
        his or her will.  For example, a chief executive in the company
        usually has a very high level of power even if he or she isn’t
        directly involved in the project.

      • Legitimacy: This is a gauge of how
        much vested interest the stakeholder has, giving the stakeholder a
        legitimate stake in the project.  For example, a marketing
        manager probably has no legitimacy in a project for the accounting
        department.

      • Urgency: This is an assessment of
        how quickly the stakeholder will expect his or her will to be acted
        upon.

    • Forecasting Methods

      • Time Series

        • Trend Estimation: This method uses
          measurements over a period of time to develop a forecast for the
          future

        • Moving average:  A moving (or rolling) average is used
          to keep short-term fluctuations from causing erratic
          predictions

        • Exponential smoothing:
          Exponential smoothing is similar to a moving average, except it
          applies a decrease weight to older measurements to better
          reflect more recent trends.

        • Linear prediction: A mathematical technique that can be used for linear systems.
          Linear systems are those whose current outputs are highly
          dependent upon past inputs, and therefore predictable.

        • Growth curve: A growth curve is a set of past and regular measurements plotted
          onto a graph.

        • Extrapolation:  Uses formulas to determine what a
          future measurement will be based on a set of known measurements.

      • Casual/Econometric

        • Regression analysis:  This method relies
          on determining the dependencies and relationships of variables that
          can influence an outcome.

        • Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and
          Autoregressive integrated moving average (AIRMA): These methods
          uses a time series of measurements and the Box-Jenkins model,
          which incorporates an autoregressive (AR) part and a moving average
          (MA) part.

        • Econometrics: These methods combine
          principles from economics and statistics to predict future behavior.

      • Judgmental

        • Composite forecasts: This approach uses
          predictions from multiple forecasts based on different methods.

        • Surveys:  Surveys collect data that can
          be quantitatively analyzed to forecast future behavior.

        • Delphi method: The Delphi method uses
          data collected from experts in several rounds of surveys.

        • Scenario building: Scenario building
          anticipates behavior that can occur based upon different situations.

        • Technology forecasting: This method is
          generally used for procedures, techniques and machines since it
          predicts future behavior based on an assessment of future
          technological change.

        • Forecast by analogy: This method uses
          similar historical events to predict the future behavior.

      • Other

        • Simulation: This method constructs a
          model that can be used to gain insight into its behavior and
          introduce variables to see how the model behaves.

        • Probabilistic forecasting: This approach
          uses several methods to derive a forecast based on
          occurrence/magnitude probability.

        • Ensemble forecasting:  This method is a
          form of Monte Carlo analysis, which is a simulation technique.

        • Reference class forecasting: An approach
          based on the theories of Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky that
          attempt to overcome the tendency to overestimate benefits and
          underestimate risks.

        • Prediction market: This method uses
          speculation in market-based event to determine the probability
          of an event’s outcome.

      • Tight Matrix – Is physically collocating the team in a single area (ESI,
        2009).

  • PMBOK Chapter 11 – Project Risk Management

    • Assumptions analysis, which reviews the
      reliability of each assumption, what consequences will occur if the
      assumption turns out to be inaccurate, and what risk factors are
      generated by the assumption.

    • Checklist analysis is where checklists
      can be developed based on the risk categories (used in the risk
      breakdown structure) or from similar projects. As these checklists are
      reviewed throughout the project, they should be improved upon so that
      they’re beneficial to subsequent projects.

    • SWOT Analysis is a strategic planning method used
      to evaluate the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats involved
      in a project.

      • Strengths: attributes of the
        person or company that are helpful to achieving the objective.

      • Weaknesses: attributes of the
        person or company that are harmful to achieving the objective.

      • Opportunities: external
        conditions that are helpful to achieving the objective.

      • Threats: external
        conditions which could do damage to the objective.

    • Residual risks are those that remain and whose probability
      and impact are such that they’re acceptable to the performing
      organization’s level of risk tolerance. They can also be those risks in
      which there are no reasonable responses for.

    • Secondary risks are those that arise from the primary risk
      response activities, and sometimes the secondary risks pose a greater
      threat than the original risk.

    • Avoid: Avoidance activities aim to completely eliminate a
      risk’s probability or impact to zero.  Avoidance can take several forms,
      such as restructuring the project activities, scope, schedule, or cost
      to eradicate the root causes leading to the risk.

    • Mitigate: If the risk cannot be avoided, actions might be
      taken to reduce the risk’s probability or its impact if it does occur. A
      mitigated risk response may still require a contingent plan.

    • Transfer: Transference assigns all or part of risk to a third
      party through outsourcing, contracts, insurance, warranties, guarantees,
      or performance clauses.

    • Sensitivity analysis looks individually
      at each project objective and measures how uncertainty could impact that
      objective.  he results of sensitivity analysis are usually shown as
      a tornado diagram or a spider diagram. A tornado diagram is named
      due to its funneled appearance.

    • Risk Register

      • Watchlist: Low priority risks
        should be regularly monitored so make sure they are not occurring
        and that their probability, impact, or priority hasn’t changed

      • Prioritized risks: Qualitative
        analysis results in which risks are the highest priority and should
        receive detailed risk management efforts

      • Urgent risks: Risk processes may
        uncover risks that are already underway or which are imminent.
        Urgent risks need immediate planning and action

      • Trends and common factors:  Risk
        categories, root causes, and impacts may expose trends that can make
        for more efficient risk response planning or risk monitoring

      • Probabilities: Risk scores can be
        aggregated and analyzed at the objective, deliverable,  or project
        level to predict how likely it is that the project will reach its
        objectives. An overall risk level for the project can also be
        tabulated

    • Surveys, such as the Delphi technique,
      can be used to gather risk information from subject matter experts. The
      Delphi technique does this anonymously so that the results can be
      analyzed by a third party without any bias as to the source of the
      opinion. The tabulated results can then be used to reach a consensus on
      project risks.

    • Expected monetary value (EMV) is the
      cost or benefit of an uncertain event. It’s calculated by multiplying
      the monetary impact by probability. EMV is what one could expect over
      time if the condition is repeated over and over.

      • Per the PM Road Trip, a carnival game in which
        there are three shells but only one has a ping-pong ball under it.
        The game costs $1 to play and the winner will receive $2 if he correctly
        picks the shell with the ball hidden under it. There are two outcomes
        based on the one-in-three chance of choosing the correct
        shell: either the player loses 66.66% of the time or he wins two dollars
        33.33% of the time. The EVM for this game is:

      • EMV = (66.66% x $0) + (33.33% x $2)

      • EMV = $0.67

    • Risk audits review the overall risk management policies,
      procedures, and processes. Audits review the effectiveness of the
      project risk management plan. Risk audits can also refer to
      analyzing whether the risk response actions were  effective and what
      impact they had on the project’s overall risk level.

    • Responses for positive risks (opportunities)

      • Exploit: Exploitation aims to ensure that the risk event
        definitely occurs so that it’s benefits can be realized. Exploitation
        can also take advantage of a definitive opportunity by maximizing its
        benefits. For example, if a warmer than normal weather pattern emerges
        during the winter, the opportunity can be exploited by immediately
        adjusting the construction schedule to take advance of the good weather.

      • Enhance: If actions can’t be taken to guarantee that the
        opportunity will occur then responses might be taken to enhance its
        probability or its beneficial impact if it does occur.

      • Share: Sharing is similar to transference, but its aim is to
        share the opportunity with a third party who is best able to capitalize
        on it. Many technology companies establish partnerships with other
        companies to encourage further development around each other’s products.
        For example, if company A develops a new memory chip it may pre-release
        the chip to manufacturers so that they can work on incorporating the
        chip into a next generation of hand-held computing devices. Company
        A is sharing a marketing opportunity with its partners.

    • Risks related to
      weather, natural disaster, climate, or environmental effects. Natural
      disasters are a type of risk known as

      force majeure
      ,
      which  include any long-term disruptions that can’t be reasonably
      foreseen nor prevented.

    • Modeling and simulation. A
      project simulation uses a model that translates the specified detailed
      uncertainties of the project into their potential impact on project
      objectives. Iterative simulations are typically performed using the Monte
      Carlo
      technique. In a simulation, the project model is computed many
      times (iterated), with the input values (e.g., cost estimates or activity
      durations
      ) chosen at random for each iteration from the probability
      distributions of these variables. A probability distribution (e.g., total
      cost or completion date) is calculated from the iterations. For a cost
      risk analysis
      , a simulation uses cost estimates. For a schedule risk
      analysis
      , the schedule network diagram and duration estimates are used.


  • PMBOK Chapter 12 – Project Procurement Management

    • Contract Types

      • Fixed Price (FP or FFP – “firm fixed
        price”) also called “Lump Sum”

        • Fixed Price Contracts (FFP)

        • Fixed Price Incentive Fee Contracts (FPIF)

        • Fixed Price Economic Price Adjustment
          Contracts (FP-EPA)

      • Cost-Reimbursable Contracts

        • Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF or sometimes
          just Cost Plus)

        • Cost Plus Percentage of Costs (CPPC)

        • Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)

      • Time and Materials (T&M)

    • Sometimes before a customer issues an RFP or RFQ or IFB, the customer
      will issue a Request for Information (RFI). The purpose of the RFI
      is
      to gain “marketing intelligence” about what products, services, and vendors
      are available.

      • A request for quotation (RFQ) is a standard business process
        whose purpose is to invite suppliers into a bidding process to bid on
        specific products or services. RFQ generally means the thing same as IFB
        (Invitation For Bid).

      • A request for proposal (referred to as
        RFP)
        is an
        invitation for suppliers, often through a bidding process, to submit a
        proposal on a specific commodity or service. A bidding process is one of the
        best methods for leveraging a company’s negotiating ability and purchasing
        power with suppliers. The RFP process brings structure to the procurement
        decision and allows the risks and benefits to be identified clearly upfront.

      • An invitation for bid (IFB) or
        invitation to bid (ITB)
        is an invitation to contractors or
        equipment suppliers, through a bidding process, to submit a proposal on
        a specific project to be realized or product or service to be furnished.
        IFB is generally the thing same as RFQ.


  • PMBOK Chapter 13 –
    Professional and Social Responsibility

    • Stuff not defined in 4th Ed PMBOK

      • Activity definition refers to the process of parsing a project into
        a number of individual tasks which must be completed before the
        deliverables can be considered completed. Activity definitions rely on a
        number of specific input processes. These include enterprise
        environmental factors,
        organizational process assets, the
        project scope statement, the work breakdown structure, the WBS
        dictionary, the project management plan (which consists of the project
        scope management plan and the schedule management plan). Through use of
        these inputs, the activities that will need to ultimately be completed
        in order to compete all of the project objectives can be readily
        defined, and the activity definition can be further accomplished through
        the utilization of a number of tools and techniques including decomposition,
        templates, rolling wave planning,
        expert judgment, and planning components. The four ultimate outputs
        of the activity definition process are the activity list, the resulting
        activity attributes, all
        requested changes, and any
        milestones.  This term is defined in the 3rd edition of the

        PMBOK
        but not in the 4th.



      • Peter
        Drucker Wikipedia

        – Management by Objectives (SMART)

        • Specific

        • Measurable

        • Agreed Upon

        • Realistic

        • Time Constrained


      • Bipert Float



      • Scrum – wikipedia

        • An iterative incremental framework for managing complex work (such as
          new product development) commonly used with

          agile software development
          .



      • Waterfall model – wikipedia



      • Spiral model – wikipedia



      • Agile
        software development – wikipedia

        • Oracle has acquired Agile, a leading
          provider of product lifecycle management (PLM) software solutions.

  • Misc PM Stuff

    • Dr. Bob Parson’s (Go Daddy) Secrets to Getting Things Done

      • Delegate, delegate

      • Selfish with time

      • Blunt and to the Point

      • Deal head-on with  problems

      • TQM – Empower the people

      • Meetings Short < 1 Hr

      • Avoid Business Lunch -> Working Lunch

      • Avoid Group Decision Making – Quick to decide

      • Never answer your phone

  • References


 


Not rated yet

This page was last updated on